<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>&#62;Tachinid Recording Scheme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog</link>
	<description>a site about tachinids...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:27:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Some name changes</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=1002</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=1002#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 22:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=1002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Belshaw&#8217;s 1993 handbook was a great improvement over the nomenclature used in van Emden but since then many of the names have changed. This is pretty boring stuff, so I apologise in advance, but here are the changes and explanations, as far as I know them:</p> Timavia Robineau-Desvoidy 1863 is a junior synonym of Smidtia Robineau-Desvoidy 1830 so Timavia amoena becomes Smidtia [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Belshaw&#8217;s 1993 handbook was a great improvement over the nomenclature used in van Emden but since then many of the names have changed. This is pretty boring stuff, so I apologise in advance, but here are the changes and explanations, as far as I know them:</p>
<ul>
<li><em>Timavia</em> Robineau-Desvoidy 1863 is a junior synonym of<em> <em>Smidtia</em> </em>Robineau-Desvoidy 1830 so<em> Timavia amoena</em> becomes <em>Smidtia amoena </em>Meigen 1824.</li>
<li><em><em>Erycilla</em> </em>Mesnil 1957 is a junior synonym of<em> <em>Allophorocera</em> </em>Hendel 1901 so <em>Erycilla ferruginea</em> becomes <em>Allophorocera ferruginea </em>(Meigen 1824).</li>
<li><em>Chrysocosmius</em> Bezzi, 1907 not a valid genus name by ICZN rules (complicated story) so <em>Chrysosomopsis</em> Townsend, 1916 is used instead, which means that <em>Chrysocosmius aurata</em> becomes <em>Chrysosomopsis aurata</em> (Fallen 1820).</li>
<li><em>Microsoma exigua</em> Meigen 1824 is corrected to <em>Microsoma exiguum </em>Meigen 1824.</li>
<li><em>Actia nudibasis</em> Stein 1924 is a junior synonym of <em>Actia resinellae </em>Schrank 1781, which replaces it.</li>
<li><em>Peribaea fissicornis</em> Strobl 1909 is a junior synonym of <em>Peribaea setinervis</em> Thomson 1869, which replaces it.</li>
<li><em>Siphona mesnili </em>Andersen 1982 is a junior synonym of <em>Siphona confusa</em> Mesnil 1961, which replaces it.</li>
<li><em>Ernestia </em>Robineau-Desvoidy 1830 is a junior synonym of<em> Panzeria </em>Robineau-Desvoidy, 1830 &#8211; this has quite a far-reaching effect because <em>Ernestia puparum</em>, <em>rudis, vagans</em> &amp; <em>laevigata</em> all move to <em>Panzeria</em><em>. </em></li>
<li><em>Cyrtophleba </em>Rondani, 1856 is corrected to <em>Cyrtophloeba</em> Rondani, 1856 following the rule of the first reviser. See explanation in <em>Botria</em> (below).</li>
</ul>
<div>
<p>Taxa not in Belshaw:</p>
<ul>
<li><em><em>Bothia</em> </em>Rondani, 1868 is corrected to<em> <em>Botria</em> </em>Rondani, 1856 following the rule of the first reviser. Rondani was very poor at forming linguistically correct names and used many different variations of spelling &#8211; often in the same publication, which causes the initial confusion. The next time he used one of those spellings he became the &#8220;first reviser&#8221; under ICZN rules because he chose the &#8220;correct&#8221; spelling and so it is this that we have to use. For more information on this issue see: <em>O&#8217;Hara, Cerretti, Pape &amp; Evenhuis (2011) Nomenclatural Studies Toward a World List of Diptera Genus-Group Names. Part II: Camillo Rondani.</em></li>
</ul>
</div>
<div>This website will be changed to reflect these changes (many have been done already) but I am holding back for a little while with some until I work out the best way to do this without confusing people. In particular the changes from <em>Ernestia</em> to <em>Panzeria</em> are potentially quite confusing.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1002</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Panzeria, Eurithia, Appendicia &amp; Fausta male genitalia</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=996</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=996#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 21:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Appendicia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurithia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fausta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Panzeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[van Emden]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a reprint of the genitalia figures from van Emden&#8217;s 1957 handbook &#8211; out of print for many years. I find them quite useful for double-checking males &#8211; if I get good feedback then I might turn this into a larger article.</p> <p></p> <p>For reference the key to this diagram is:</p> <p>P &#8211; Panzeria [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a reprint of the genitalia figures from van Emden&#8217;s 1957 handbook &#8211; out of print for many years. I find them quite useful for double-checking males &#8211; if I get good feedback then I might turn this into a larger article.</p>
<p><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Eurithia-figures-combined.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-997" title="Eurithia-figures-combined" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Eurithia-figures-combined-1024x685.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="428" /></a></p>
<p>For reference the key to this diagram is:</p>
<p><strong>P</strong> &#8211; <em>Panzeria laevigata</em>, <strong>A</strong> &#8211; <em>Panzeria </em><em>rudis</em>, <strong>B</strong> &#8211; <em>Panzeria </em><em>vagans</em>, <strong>I</strong> &#8211; <em>Fausta nemorum</em>, <strong>J</strong> &#8211; <em>Appendicia truncata</em>, <strong>K</strong> &#8211; <em>Eurithia anthophila</em>, <strong>L</strong> &#8211; <em>Eurithia caesia</em>, <strong>Q</strong> &#8211; <em>Eurithia intermedia</em>, <strong>R</strong> &#8211; <em>Eurithia connivens</em>, <strong>S</strong> &#8211; <em>Eurithia vivida</em>, <strong>T</strong> &#8211; <em>Eurithia consobrina</em></p>
<p>sf = superior forceps = cercus</p>
<p>if = inferior forceps = surstylus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=996</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Botria subalpina found in Scotland</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=987</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=987#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[New Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botria subalpina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Botria (=Bothria) subalpina is a Spring species previously thought to be found in northern &#38; eastern Europe &#8211; I have specimens from Finland and Bavaria. But recently Murdo Macdonald sent some flies to the National Museum of Scotland and David Horsfield spotted a fly that keyed out to Bothria subalpina in the Central European key. He [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Botria (=Bothria) subalpina</em> is a Spring species previously thought to be found in northern &amp; eastern Europe &#8211; I have specimens from Finland and Bavaria. But recently Murdo Macdonald sent some flies to the National Museum of Scotland and David Horsfield spotted a fly that keyed out to <em>Bothria subalpina</em> in the Central European key. He sent the specimen to Hans-Peter Tschorsnig in Germany who confirmed the identification!</p>
<p>Apparently the name has changed from <em>Bothria</em> to <em>Botria </em>due to a Rondani misspelling that has only recently come to light. Also Villeneuve wrote in his 1910 type description for <em>subalpina</em> that he had been sent a specimen taken near Birmingham by Wainwright. It would be interesting to track down this specimen and confirm the identification and locality.</p>
<p>Here is a photo of a specimen from Finland and a very bad photo of one from Germany:</p>
<p><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Botria-subalpina-Finland-2012-05-09-13.54.10-ZS-PMax.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-988" title="Botria subalpina (Finland) 2012-05-09-13.54.10-ZS-PMax" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Botria-subalpina-Finland-2012-05-09-13.54.10-ZS-PMax-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Botria-subalpina-Germany-2012-05-09-14.04.46-ZS-PMax.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-989" title="Botria subalpina (Germany) 2012-05-09-14.04.46-ZS-PMax" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Botria-subalpina-Germany-2012-05-09-14.04.46-ZS-PMax-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a></p>
<p>Currently, in Belshaw, this species would get lost around couplet #27  because it looks like it should go to #28 (<em>Phorocera</em>/<em>Parasetigena</em>) but the basals are between 2-3x as long as the scutellum so it is weak here and of course if you go to #28 it isn&#8217;t <em>Parasetigena</em> because <em>Botria</em> has median discals and it isn&#8217;t <em>Phorocera</em> because the male genitalia are all wrong (smaller than <em>Phorocera</em>) and it has pale tibiae. I think the pale tibiae are probably the best way to split <em>Botria</em> out but I need to double-check all of the other alternatives from #27 onwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=987</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Phytomyptera nigrina seen in Lincolnshire</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=983</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=983#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 14:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Had a very good record recently, sent in by Phil Porter, of Phytomyptera nigrina. Richard Davidson took the specimen at Whisby Nature Park on 22nd April. Here is a photo of the specimen &#8211; note the &#8220;disappearing&#8221; median vein and the complete lack of m-cu vein &#8211; very rare features:</p> <p></p> [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a very good record recently, sent in by Phil Porter, of <em>Phytomyptera nigrina</em>. Richard Davidson took the specimen at Whisby Nature Park on 22nd April. Here is a photo of the specimen &#8211; note the &#8220;disappearing&#8221; median vein and the complete lack of m-cu vein &#8211; very rare features:</p>
<p><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Phytomyptera-nigrina-S8-2012-05-09-14.20.07-ZS-PMax.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-984" title="Phytomyptera-nigrina-S8-2012-05-09-14.20.07-ZS-PMax" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Phytomyptera-nigrina-S8-2012-05-09-14.20.07-ZS-PMax-225x300.jpg" alt="" width="225" height="300" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=983</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The first photos through the Leica S8APO</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=968</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=968#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dinera grisescens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exorista rustica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lydina aenea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lypha dubia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It has taken a while to get the camera hooked up to the microscope because it is quite a complicated process, involving lots of adapters and converters &#8211; not to mention getting the optics and the extension tubes correctly arranged. The first shots really weren&#8217;t worth looking at but today I started to capture images [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has taken a while to get the camera hooked up to the microscope because it is quite a complicated process, involving lots of adapters and converters &#8211; not to mention getting the optics and the extension tubes correctly arranged. The first shots really weren&#8217;t worth looking at but today I started to capture images that are getting a bit better &#8211; still not the quality I hope to achieve, but getting there.</p>
<p>Although the microscope is rated at 80x the actual magnification through the microscope tube is related to the size of the sensor and this works out at about 10x &#8211; 15x but this is still very good and a perfect range for what I want to do. The lighting in these photos is very rough and contrasty because I haven&#8217;t experimented with flash diffusers yet but it gives you an idea of what is possible.</p>
<p>This is a butterfly wing (<em>Eunica coelina</em>):</p>
<p><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Eunica-coelina-s8-2012-04-24-11.05.04-ZS-PMax.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-972" title="Eunica-coelina-s8-2012-04-24-11.05.04-ZS-PMax" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Eunica-coelina-s8-2012-04-24-11.05.04-ZS-PMax-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p>
<p>This is a lateral view of <em>Dinera grisecens</em>, showing a bit of the katepisternum; a nice row of hypopleural bristles; the hind spiracle with hairy flap; haltere and abdominal tergite 1+2:</p>
<p><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Dinera-grisescens-lateral-s8-2012-04-24-11.53.22-ZS-PMax-2048.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-970" title="Dinera-grisescens-lateral-s8-2012-04-24-11.53.22-ZS-PMax-2048" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Dinera-grisescens-lateral-s8-2012-04-24-11.53.22-ZS-PMax-2048-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p>
<p>Contrast that with the spiracle of Exorista rustica, which has a &#8220;classic&#8221; single-flap arrangement:</p>
<div id="attachment_976" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 650px"><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Exorista-rustica-spiracle-s8-2012-04-25-10.36.05-ZS-PMax.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-976" title="Exorista-rustica-spiracle-s8-2012-04-25-10.36.05-ZS-PMax" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Exorista-rustica-spiracle-s8-2012-04-25-10.36.05-ZS-PMax-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Exorista rustica spiracle - showing the single flap</p></div>
<p>&#8230; and the next 2 show classic polideine spiracles, with 2 equally-sized flaps:</p>
<div id="attachment_978" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 650px"><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Lypha-dubia-spiracle-s8-2012-04-25-15.23.21-ZS-PMax.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-978" title="Lypha-dubia-spiracle-s8-2012-04-25-15.23.21-ZS-PMax" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Lypha-dubia-spiracle-s8-2012-04-25-15.23.21-ZS-PMax-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Lypha dubia spiracle - showing the 2 equally sized flaps</p></div>
<div id="attachment_977" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 650px"><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Lydina-aenea-spiracle-s8-2012-04-25-11.08.21-ZS-PMax.jpg"><img class="size-large wp-image-977" title="Lydina-aenea-spiracle-s8-2012-04-25-11.08.21-ZS-PMax" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Lydina-aenea-spiracle-s8-2012-04-25-11.08.21-ZS-PMax-1024x768.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Lydina aenea spiracle - showing the equally sized flaps</p></div>
<p>I hope to make a few more photos over the coming days, once I have worked out the problem with parfocality &#8211; the camera should be in focus at the same point as the main microscope eyepieces but at the moment it isn&#8217;t &#8230; a bit more experimentation needed! <img src='http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=968</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tachina lurida on the wing</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=940</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=940#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gymnocheta viridis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tachina lurida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Had a nice record from Tristan Bantock on the 17th &#8211; a Tachina lurida, seen on Parkland Walk near Crouch Hill tube station. They look superficially like the slightly earlier Tachina ursina but they are slightly less hairy and they lack a white band on the front of tergite 5.</p> <p class="wp-caption-text">Tachina lurida, © Tristan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had a nice record from Tristan Bantock on the 17th &#8211; a <em>Tachina lurida</em>, seen on Parkland Walk near Crouch Hill tube station. They look superficially like the slightly earlier <em>Tachina ursina</em> but they are slightly less hairy and they lack a white band on the front of tergite 5.</p>
<div id="attachment_946" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Tachina-lurida-tristan-bantock.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-946" title="Tachina-lurida-tristan-bantock" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Tachina-lurida-tristan-bantock-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tachina lurida, © Tristan Bantock, 2012</p></div>
<p>We&#8217;re also getting plenty of reports of <em>Gymnocheta viridis</em> on the wing in the UK &#8211; usually seen sunning themselves on fence posts and tree trunks.</p>
<div id="attachment_259" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Gymnocheta-viridis-Hartslock-May-2004-04.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-259" title="Gymnocheta viridis" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Gymnocheta-viridis-Hartslock-May-2004-04-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Gymnocheta viridis, © Chris Raper, 2011</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=940</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Natural England funding</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=868</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=868#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It has been a hectic and exciting start to 2012 for the recording scheme, with the recent good news that we had won funding from Natural England!!</p> <p>For a while the government has been concerned to improve biological recording capacity in the UK and, with the support of Defra, the Department for Environment, Food and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has been a hectic and exciting start to 2012 for the recording scheme, with the recent good news that we had won funding from Natural England!!</p>
<p>For a while the government has been concerned to improve biological recording capacity in the UK and, with the support of Defra, the <a href="http://www.defra.gov.uk/" target="_blank">Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs</a>, and <a href="http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/" target="_blank">Natural England</a> they set up the <em>Fund for biological recording in the voluntary sector</em>. It was to this fund that we applied.</p>
<p>Our application had to be submitted in quite a hurry because the deadlines were tight but, thanks to some great help from our friends at the BRC in Wallingford, we managed to make the deadline and were one of under 40 applicants to be successful!</p>
<p>The funding has been given for the purchase of a new Leica S8APO microscope with lights and camera adapters so that we will be able to produce deep-focus photographs of key tachinid structures as well as tutorials on various aspects of entomology. The first articles have been published in the &#8216;Tutorials&#8217; menu so keep checking back for more in the coming months.</p>
<p>Anyway, here it is &#8211; isn&#8217;t she a beauty!? <img src='http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>

<a href='http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?attachment_id=923' title='leica-006'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/leica-006-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="leica-006" title="leica-006" /></a>
<a href='http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?attachment_id=924' title='leica-003'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/leica-003-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="leica-003" title="leica-003" /></a>

<p>In these photos the camera adapters haven&#8217;t been fitted because at the time of writing I am waiting for a few extra tubes to be sent to achieve parfocality with the eyepieces. But you can see the port emerging from the top of the microscope. My trusty Meiji EMZ sits to the left and, with its slightly deeper working distance (90mm instead of 75mm on the Leica), will still be used for sorting malaise trap catches etc.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/logo.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-737 aligncenter" title="Natural England logo" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/logo.png" alt="" width="90" height="90" /></a></td>
<td><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/BRC__OFFICIAL_vector_logo.png"><img class="wp-image-734 aligncenter" title="BRC logo" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/BRC__OFFICIAL_vector_logo.png" alt="" width="356" height="106" /></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/CEH_new.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-735 aligncenter" title="CEH logo" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/CEH_new.png" alt="" width="244" height="60" /></a></td>
<td><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/JNCCLogo_3DCol.jpg"><img class="wp-image-733 aligncenter" title="JNCC logo" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/JNCCLogo_3DCol.jpg" alt="" width="218" height="96" /></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=868</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More early sightings</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=865</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=865#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 16:59:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The warm, sunny Spring weather has brought out the early tachinids and we have already received records for Tachina ursina, Gonia picea, Lypha dubia, Campylocheta praecox, Macquartia tenebricosa &#38; grisea, Brachicheta strigosa &#38; Cyzenis albicans!</p> ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The warm, sunny Spring weather has brought out the early tachinids and we have already received records for <em>Tachina ursina, Gonia picea, Lypha dubia, Campylocheta praecox, Macquartia tenebricosa &amp; grisea, Brachicheta strigosa &amp; Cyzenis albicans</em>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=865</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gonia picea on the wing &#8211; 21/3/2012</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=848</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=848#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 23:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gonia picea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hartslock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It was a sunny day so I took a short walk across Hartslock Nature Reserve this lunchtime, with a vague idea that I might see some tachinids, like Tachina ursina. But to my great surprise (because they had never been recorded there before) I saw lots of Gonia picea all zigzagging low over the grass. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a sunny day so I took a short walk across <a href="http://hartslock.org.uk/" target="_blank">Hartslock Nature Reserve</a> this lunchtime, with a vague idea that I might see some tachinids, like <em>Tachina ursina</em>. But to my great surprise (because they had never been recorded there before) I saw lots of <em>Gonia picea</em> all zigzagging low over the grass. This species seems to have done well recently because we received more records than normal last year and perhaps it has benefited from the recent warm, dry Springs?</p>

<a href='http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?attachment_id=849' title='Gonia-picea---Hartslock-2012-03-21_002'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Gonia-picea-Hartslock-2012-03-21_002-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Gonia-picea---Hartslock-2012-03-21_002" title="Gonia-picea---Hartslock-2012-03-21_002" /></a>
<a href='http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?attachment_id=850' title='Gonia-picea---Hartslock-2012-03-21_008'><img width="150" height="150" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Gonia-picea-Hartslock-2012-03-21_008-150x150.jpg" class="attachment-thumbnail" alt="Gonia-picea---Hartslock-2012-03-21_008" title="Gonia-picea---Hartslock-2012-03-21_008" /></a>

<p>Anyway, it shows that there are interesting tachinids flying right now so get out with your nets and cameras on any sunny day! <img src='http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=848</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A typical tachinid wing</title>
		<link>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=707</link>
		<comments>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=707#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 18:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ChrisR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tutorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tachina grossa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?p=707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a photograph of a Tachina grossa wing, annotated to show the commonest features that are used in the keys:</p> <p>I always orient myself by looking for the smallest vertical vein called r-m, the little one in the middle &#8211; it links the last true radial vein (r4+5) to the median. The median vein is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a photograph of a <em>Tachina grossa</em> wing, annotated to show the commonest features that are used in the keys:</p>
<p><a href="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Tachina-grossa-wing-annotated.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-708" title="Tachina-grossa-wing-annotated" src="http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-content/uploads/Tachina-grossa-wing-annotated-1024x576.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="360" /></a>I always orient myself by looking for the smallest vertical vein called <strong>r-m</strong>, the little one in the middle &#8211; it links the last true radial vein (<strong>r4+5</strong>) to the <strong>median</strong>. The median vein is probably the most important in tachinids because it often bends in different ways and either joins or doesn&#8217;t join r4+5. If the median vein joins r4+5 before the wing edge then it forms a small stalk called the <strong>petiole</strong> (not on this photo). Sometimes the bend has a little stalk (<strong>appendix</strong> &#8211; not in this photo) or crease that extends towards the wing margin. If you go up from r4+5 the next radial is r2+3 and these 2 veins meet together, near the body, at another important areas called the <strong>node</strong>. The node has varying numbers of hairs on it and sometimes these hairs extend along r4+5 towards or even beyond r-m. Above r2+3 you will see <strong>r1</strong> and then to the left <strong>sc</strong>, the sub-costal vein. Along the leading edge is the <strong>costal</strong> vein (annotated in sections &#8211; <strong>CSx</strong>) &#8211; these sections are of varying relative lengths and this can be important. The last section (<strong>CS6</strong>) extends to a notional point that is the tip of the wing. Below the median vein the next radial is called the <strong>cubital</strong> vein and it is linked to the median by <strong>m-cu</strong>. The point where m-cu joins the median is important in some species, as is the length of the section of the cubital beyond m-cu. The final vein that is of interest to us is the <strong>anal</strong> vein &#8211; we are usually just asked to see whether it extends to the edge of the wing, but watch out &#8211; make sure that it isn&#8217;t just a crease that meets the wing edge! <img src='http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tachinidae.org.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=707</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

